open-source 3d human lower limb musculoskeletal model Search Results


92
ATCC cp5 51 c4 crimson
Monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice immunized with <t> CP5 </t> or CP8 conjugate vaccines.
Cp5 51 C4 Crimson, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cp5 51 c4 crimson/product/ATCC
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cp5 51 c4 crimson - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd open-source musculoskeletal modeling software opensim v3.3
Monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice immunized with <t> CP5 </t> or CP8 conjugate vaccines.
Open Source Musculoskeletal Modeling Software Opensim V3.3, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/open-source musculoskeletal modeling software opensim v3.3/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
open-source musculoskeletal modeling software opensim v3.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Open Source Human Musculoskeletal System Simulation Software, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd musculoskeletal modeling software
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Musculoskeletal Modeling Software, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/musculoskeletal modeling software/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
musculoskeletal modeling software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd open-source software opensim
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Open Source Software Opensim, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/open-source software opensim/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
open-source software opensim - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd tm 6 open-source simulation platform
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Tm 6 Open Source Simulation Platform, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tm 6 open-source simulation platform/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tm 6 open-source simulation platform - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd opensim-jam
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Opensim Jam, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/opensim-jam/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
opensim-jam - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd calibrated emg-informed neuromusculoskeletal
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Calibrated Emg Informed Neuromusculoskeletal, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/calibrated emg-informed neuromusculoskeletal/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
calibrated emg-informed neuromusculoskeletal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OpenSim Ltd full-body spine model
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Full Body Spine Model, supplied by OpenSim Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/full-body spine model/product/OpenSim Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
full-body spine model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Truven Health truven marketscan
Comparison of elbow <t>musculoskeletal</t> models.
Truven Marketscan, supplied by Truven Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/truven marketscan/product/Truven Health
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
truven marketscan - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
LifeCell Inc alloderm
Partial list of commercially available biologic scaffold materials
Alloderm, supplied by LifeCell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/alloderm/product/LifeCell Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alloderm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Truven Health infectious diseases, hiv
Decomposition of Variance reduction by Spending Type and Category
Infectious Diseases, Hiv, supplied by Truven Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/infectious diseases, hiv/product/Truven Health
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
infectious diseases, hiv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice immunized with  CP5  or CP8 conjugate vaccines.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice immunized with CP5 or CP8 conjugate vaccines.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Isolation

Reactivity of five mAbs with native and O-deacetylated CP5 and CP8. (A) Structural similarities between CP5 and CP8 and their sites of O-acetylation (O-Ac). Both CP5-specific mAbs (4C2 and 5D1) reacted with (B) native CP5, whereas only mAb 4C2 reacted with (C) O-deacetylated CP5 (De-O-CP5). Three CP8-specific mAbs (5A6, 3B5, and 4G5) reacted with (D) native CP8, whereas only 5A6 and 3B5 reacted with (E) O-deacetylated (De-O-CP8) CP8. D-ManNAcA, N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acid; L-FucNAc, N-acetyl-L-fucosamine; D-FucNAc, N-acetyl-D-fucosamine. Each sample was tested in duplicate, and the ELISAs were performed at least twice. The mean values of a representative experiment are shown.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reactivity of five mAbs with native and O-deacetylated CP5 and CP8. (A) Structural similarities between CP5 and CP8 and their sites of O-acetylation (O-Ac). Both CP5-specific mAbs (4C2 and 5D1) reacted with (B) native CP5, whereas only mAb 4C2 reacted with (C) O-deacetylated CP5 (De-O-CP5). Three CP8-specific mAbs (5A6, 3B5, and 4G5) reacted with (D) native CP8, whereas only 5A6 and 3B5 reacted with (E) O-deacetylated (De-O-CP8) CP8. D-ManNAcA, N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acid; L-FucNAc, N-acetyl-L-fucosamine; D-FucNAc, N-acetyl-D-fucosamine. Each sample was tested in duplicate, and the ELISAs were performed at least twice. The mean values of a representative experiment are shown.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques:

Strains used in this study or tested in the colony immunoblot.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Strains used in this study or tested in the colony immunoblot.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Western Blot, Genetically Modified, Expressing, Mutagenesis

mAbs CP5–4C2 and CP8–5A6 were tested by colony immunoblot for reactivity with S. aureus type 5 and 8 reference strains or clinical isolates. The staphylococcal isolates are listed in Table 2. mAb 4C2 reacted with all 14 serotype 5 isolates, whereas mAb 5A6 reacted with 19 of 21 serotype 8 isolates. CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; CP-, capsule negative. The immunoblot was performed three times, and a representative blot is shown.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: mAbs CP5–4C2 and CP8–5A6 were tested by colony immunoblot for reactivity with S. aureus type 5 and 8 reference strains or clinical isolates. The staphylococcal isolates are listed in Table 2. mAb 4C2 reacted with all 14 serotype 5 isolates, whereas mAb 5A6 reacted with 19 of 21 serotype 8 isolates. CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; CP-, capsule negative. The immunoblot was performed three times, and a representative blot is shown.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Western Blot

Quantitation of cell-associated and soluble CP5 or CP8 produced by clinical isolates of S. aureus cultivated in RMPI + 1% casamino acids. CP levels were measured by an ELISA inhibition method, and CP5 and CP8 concentrations are expressed relative to those of Reynolds (CP5) and Reynolds (CP8), respectively, which were included as reference strains on every assay. CP levels were compared by one-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were made to the reference strains Reynolds (CP5) and Reynolds (CP8). ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantitation of cell-associated and soluble CP5 or CP8 produced by clinical isolates of S. aureus cultivated in RMPI + 1% casamino acids. CP levels were measured by an ELISA inhibition method, and CP5 and CP8 concentrations are expressed relative to those of Reynolds (CP5) and Reynolds (CP8), respectively, which were included as reference strains on every assay. CP levels were compared by one-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were made to the reference strains Reynolds (CP5) and Reynolds (CP8). ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Quantitation Assay, Produced, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Inhibition

Opsonic activity of CP5-specific mAbs (A) 4C2 and (B) 5D1 against wild type strain Reynolds (CP5) and its isogenic cap5H deletion mutant that produces wild-type levels of O-deacetylated CP5. The mAbs were serially diluted 3-fold and tested in the OPK assay. The results are expressed as percent changes in the number of CFU/ml after a 2-h incubation with mAb, HL60 cells, and a complement (C’) source. The samples labeled SA+ C’+HL60 contain no mAb. The titer is expressed as the lowest mAb dilution that killed 50% of the inoculum (dotted line). The experiment was performed twice, and a representative experiment is shown.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Opsonic activity of CP5-specific mAbs (A) 4C2 and (B) 5D1 against wild type strain Reynolds (CP5) and its isogenic cap5H deletion mutant that produces wild-type levels of O-deacetylated CP5. The mAbs were serially diluted 3-fold and tested in the OPK assay. The results are expressed as percent changes in the number of CFU/ml after a 2-h incubation with mAb, HL60 cells, and a complement (C’) source. The samples labeled SA+ C’+HL60 contain no mAb. The titer is expressed as the lowest mAb dilution that killed 50% of the inoculum (dotted line). The experiment was performed twice, and a representative experiment is shown.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Mutagenesis, Incubation, Labeling

Comparative opsonic activity of mAbs against serotype 5 and 8 S. aureus strains. (A) Backbone-specific CP5 mAb 4C2 showed somewhat better opsonic activity against Reynolds (CP5) than strain Newman. (B) Backbone-specific CP8 mAbs 5A6 showed comparable opsonic activity against Reynolds (CP8) and MRSA strain ST80–16. (C) O-acetyl-specific CP8 mAb 4G5 showed greater OPK activity against Reynolds (CP8) than strain ST80–16. The sample labeled 0 antibody contained HL60s, S. aureus, and the complement source. The data shown are means ( ± standard errors) of three to four experiments.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative opsonic activity of mAbs against serotype 5 and 8 S. aureus strains. (A) Backbone-specific CP5 mAb 4C2 showed somewhat better opsonic activity against Reynolds (CP5) than strain Newman. (B) Backbone-specific CP8 mAbs 5A6 showed comparable opsonic activity against Reynolds (CP8) and MRSA strain ST80–16. (C) O-acetyl-specific CP8 mAb 4G5 showed greater OPK activity against Reynolds (CP8) than strain ST80–16. The sample labeled 0 antibody contained HL60s, S. aureus, and the complement source. The data shown are means ( ± standard errors) of three to four experiments.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Labeling

Passive immunization with CP5- or CP8-specific mAbs in the mouse bacteremia model. Mice were immunized IV with 100 µg of (A) CP5 mAb 4C2 or (B) CP8 mAb 5A6 24 h before challenge by the IP route with 107 CFU (A) S. aureus Reynolds (CP5) or (B) Reynolds (CP8). Control mice were immunized with irrelevant mAb 6C5 or polyclonal CP5 specific rabbit IgG (300 µg), and all mice were bled 2 h after bacterial challenge. The horizontal lines represent median CFU/ml blood for each group of mice. Bacteremia levels in mice administered mAbs 4C2 or 5A6 were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test to levels in control mice given mAb 6C5. ****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Passive immunization with CP5- or CP8-specific mAbs in the mouse bacteremia model. Mice were immunized IV with 100 µg of (A) CP5 mAb 4C2 or (B) CP8 mAb 5A6 24 h before challenge by the IP route with 107 CFU (A) S. aureus Reynolds (CP5) or (B) Reynolds (CP8). Control mice were immunized with irrelevant mAb 6C5 or polyclonal CP5 specific rabbit IgG (300 µg), and all mice were bled 2 h after bacterial challenge. The horizontal lines represent median CFU/ml blood for each group of mice. Bacteremia levels in mice administered mAbs 4C2 or 5A6 were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test to levels in control mice given mAb 6C5. ****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY

Plasma levels of CP5 or CP8 in mice infected IV with ∼2 × 108 CFU of S. aureus NRS382 (CP5+) or ST80–17 (CP8+), respectively. After 1 to 5 days, the animals were bled by cardiac stick, and the plasma extracts were prepared. CP levels were determined by an ELISA inhibition assay, and CP concentrations were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. *, P < 0.05. The lower limit of CP detection is indicated by a dashed line.

Journal: Virulence

Article Title: Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo

doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1270494

Figure Lengend Snippet: Plasma levels of CP5 or CP8 in mice infected IV with ∼2 × 108 CFU of S. aureus NRS382 (CP5+) or ST80–17 (CP8+), respectively. After 1 to 5 days, the animals were bled by cardiac stick, and the plasma extracts were prepared. CP levels were determined by an ELISA inhibition assay, and CP concentrations were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. *, P < 0.05. The lower limit of CP detection is indicated by a dashed line.

Article Snippet: A3 S. epidermidis RP62A NA Biofilm producing, methicillin-resistant strain 65 A4 S. haemolyticus JCSC 1435 NA Sequenced strain from a Japanese patient in Tokyo 66 A5 S. saprophyticus 15305 NA ATCC; genome sequenced uropathogenic isolate 67 A6 S. lugdunensis 45–6447 NA Bacteremia isolate from 2014 BWH a Staphylococcus aureus B1 Newman 5 Human isolate from 1952 68 B2 Mu50 5 Vancomycin-intermediate MRSA isolate; Japan 69 B3 COL 5 MRSA strain with SCC mec II 65 B4 502A 5 Strain adept at colonization 70 B5 NRS 382 5 USA100 MRSA NARSA b B6 NRS 383 5 USA200 MRSA NARSA B7 NRS 386 5 USA700 MRSA NARSA C1 Lowenstein 5 Nabi serotype 5 reference strain 71 C2 Reynolds (CP5) 5 Prototype CP5+ strain 17 C3 Reynolds Δ cap5H 5 Produces WT levels of O-deacetylated CP5 51 C4 Crimson 5313 5 Bacteremia isolate from 2012 BWH C5 Crimson 18207 5 Bacteremia MRSA isolate from 2013 BWH C6 29213 5 Antibiotic susceptibility testing reference strain ATCC C7 ST22 #15 5 CA-MRSA c from 2010; Regensburg, Germany F. Hanses D1 MN8 8 Menstrual toxic shock isolate 72 D2 ST80–16 8 CA-MRSA strain from 2010; Regensburg, FRG 73 D3 Wright 8 Nabi serotype 8 reference strain 71 D4 PS80 8 ATCC 27700 58 D5 Becker 8 Prototype CP8+ strain 74 D6 V8 8 Source of staphylococcal V8 protease 75 D7 HS-522 8 ST239 MRSA 76 E1 NRS 387 8 USA800 MRSA NARSA E2 NRS 483 8 USA1000 MRSA NARSA E3 NRS 484 8 USA1100 MRSA NARSA E4 GFRY 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1997 BWH E5 VP 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1995 41 E6 JP122 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH E7 JP136 8 Bacteremia isolate from 1990 BWH F1 25923 8 Seattle 1945; antibiotic reference strain ATCC F2 Reynolds (CP8) 8 Reynolds genetically modified to produce CP8 17 F3 UAMS-1 8 Genome sequenced musculoskeletal isolate 77 F4 2672 8 USA400; necrotizing pneumonia and sepsis isolate 32 F5 RF122 8 Genome sequenced bovine isolate 78 F6 Sanger 252 8 Epidemic MRSA clone 31 F7 MW2 8 Community acquired MRSA; USA400 79 G1 Sanger 476 CP- Community acquired MSSA; USA400 31 G2 8325–4 CP- NCTC; cured of three prophages 80 G3 LAC CP- Los Angeles clone; USA300 MRSA 81 G4 NRS 482 CP- USA300 MRSA NARSA G5 NRS 691 CP- USA500 MRSA NARSA G6 Cowan I CP- Isolate with high protein A expression 82 G7 Reynolds (CP-) CP- Reynolds acapsular mutant 17 Open in a separate window Note . a BWH, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. b NARSA, Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. c CA-MRSA, community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Techniques: Infection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Inhibition, MANN-WHITNEY

Comparison of elbow musculoskeletal models.

Journal: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Article Title: An Improved EMG-Driven Neuromusculoskeletal Model for Elbow Joint Muscle Torque Estimation

doi: 10.1155/2021/1985741

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of elbow musculoskeletal models.

Article Snippet: In this paper, the sEMG signals of relevant muscles are not actually collected to obtain the activation degree but obtained by using the open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software OpenSim.

Techniques: Comparison

Schematic diagram of the improved musculoskeletal model of the elbow joint established in this paper.

Journal: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Article Title: An Improved EMG-Driven Neuromusculoskeletal Model for Elbow Joint Muscle Torque Estimation

doi: 10.1155/2021/1985741

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram of the improved musculoskeletal model of the elbow joint established in this paper.

Article Snippet: In this paper, the sEMG signals of relevant muscles are not actually collected to obtain the activation degree but obtained by using the open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software OpenSim.

Techniques:

Values of formula parameters in the  musculoskeletal  model in this paper.

Journal: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Article Title: An Improved EMG-Driven Neuromusculoskeletal Model for Elbow Joint Muscle Torque Estimation

doi: 10.1155/2021/1985741

Figure Lengend Snippet: Values of formula parameters in the musculoskeletal model in this paper.

Article Snippet: In this paper, the sEMG signals of relevant muscles are not actually collected to obtain the activation degree but obtained by using the open source human musculoskeletal system simulation software OpenSim.

Techniques:

Partial list of commercially available biologic scaffold materials

Journal: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine

Article Title: Biologic Scaffolds

doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025676

Figure Lengend Snippet: Partial list of commercially available biologic scaffold materials

Article Snippet: A partial list of these products can be found in . table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Product Source species Source tissue Application focus Manufacturer AlloDerm Human Dermis Soft tissue LifeCell AlloMax Human Dermis Soft tissue Bard Davol AlloPatch HD Human Dermis Tendon, breast Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation NeoForm Human Dermis Breast Mentor Worldwide GraftJacket Human Dermis Soft tissue Kinetic Concepts Axis Human Dermis Pelvic organ prolapse Coloplast Strattice Porcine Dermis Soft tissue LifeCell TissueMend Bovine Dermis Soft tissue Stryker Avaulta, CollaMend, XenMatrix Porcine Dermis Soft tissue Bard Davol Medeor Matrix Porcine Dermis Soft tissue Koninklijke DSM DermaPure Human Dermis Chronic wounds Tissue Regenix Group ArthroFlex Human Dermis Soft tissue Arthrex Suspend Human Fascia lata Pelvic organ prolapse Coloplast Tutoplast Fascia Lata Human Fascia lata Opthalmology IOP Meso BioMatrix Porcine Mesothelium Soft tissue Koninklijke DSM Miroderm, Miromatrix Porcine Liver Soft tissue Miromatrix Medical Veritas, Dura-Guard, Peri-Guard, Vascu-Guard Bovine Pericardium Soft tissue Baxter Healthcare IOPatch Human Pericardium Opthalmology IOP Unite Equine Pericardium Soft tissue, chronic wounds Synovis Orthopedic and Woundcare DurAdapt Equine Pericardium Dura mater Pegasus Biologics CopiOs Bovine Pericardium Dentistry Zimmer Lyoplant Bovine Pericardium Dura mater B. Braun Melsungen Perimount Bovine Pericardium Valve replacement Edwards Lifesciences Permacol Porcine Porcine dermis Soft tissue Tissue Science Laboratories Oasis, Surgisis, BioDesign, Durasis, Stratasis Porcine Small intestine Soft tissue Cook Biotech Restore Porcine Small intestine Soft tissue DePuy Orthopaedics FortaFlex Porcine Small intestine Soft tissue Organogenesis CorMatrix ECM Porcine Small intestine Pericardium, cardiac tissue CorMatrix Cardiovascular CuffPatch Porcine Small intestine Rotator cuff Arthrotek AxoGuard Porcine Small intestine Nerve AxoGen MatriStem Porcine Urinary bladder Soft tissue ACell Open in a separate window Partial list of commercially available biologic scaffold materials The decision of whether to use a synthetic versus biologic material for a given clinical application depends on factors such as required mechanical strength, history of comorbidities and previous surgeries, the risk of bacterial contamination, and cost.

Techniques:

Decomposition of Variance reduction by Spending Type and Category

Journal: Health services & outcomes research methodology

Article Title: Implications of family risk pooling for individual health insurance markets

doi: 10.1007/s10742-017-0170-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Decomposition of Variance reduction by Spending Type and Category

Article Snippet: We see similar results when we decompose the reduction in variance by clinical category ( , Panel B). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 All Individual contracts Real families Difference between Individual variance and family pooling variance Total Variance $375,033,536 $167,421,605 $207,611,931 Panel A - By Type of Spending Percent of total: Inpatient 38.7% 37.4% 39.8% Outpatient 30.6% 31.9% 29.5% Rx 9.5% 8.2% 10.6% All covariances 21.2% 22.4% 20.2% Panel B - By Clinical Category Percent of total: Blood, Myeloproliferative 10.0% 9.3% 10.6% Musculoskeletal 8.5% 8.6% 8.3% Circulatory System 8.5% 8.7% 8.3% Kidney, Urinary Tract, Reproductive System 8.0% 8.8% 7.4% Digestive System, Hepatobiliary 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% Nervous System 5.1% 4.7% 5.4% Respiratory 4.1% 3.8% 4.4% Skin, Subcutaneaous, Breast 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% Infectious Diseases, HIV 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% Pregnancy, Newborns 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% Injuries, Burns, Trauma 1.8% 1.6% 1.9% Endocrine 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% Mental Health/Substance Abuse 1.3% 1.0% 1.5% Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% Other Factors 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% All covariances: 37.1% 37.9% 36.4% Open in a separate window Source: Authors' analysis of Truven MarketScan data, 2013 Decomposition of Variance reduction by Spending Type and Category

Techniques:

Crosswalk MDC categories to clinical categories analyzed here

Journal: Health services & outcomes research methodology

Article Title: Implications of family risk pooling for individual health insurance markets

doi: 10.1007/s10742-017-0170-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Crosswalk MDC categories to clinical categories analyzed here

Article Snippet: We see similar results when we decompose the reduction in variance by clinical category ( , Panel B). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 All Individual contracts Real families Difference between Individual variance and family pooling variance Total Variance $375,033,536 $167,421,605 $207,611,931 Panel A - By Type of Spending Percent of total: Inpatient 38.7% 37.4% 39.8% Outpatient 30.6% 31.9% 29.5% Rx 9.5% 8.2% 10.6% All covariances 21.2% 22.4% 20.2% Panel B - By Clinical Category Percent of total: Blood, Myeloproliferative 10.0% 9.3% 10.6% Musculoskeletal 8.5% 8.6% 8.3% Circulatory System 8.5% 8.7% 8.3% Kidney, Urinary Tract, Reproductive System 8.0% 8.8% 7.4% Digestive System, Hepatobiliary 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% Nervous System 5.1% 4.7% 5.4% Respiratory 4.1% 3.8% 4.4% Skin, Subcutaneaous, Breast 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% Infectious Diseases, HIV 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% Pregnancy, Newborns 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% Injuries, Burns, Trauma 1.8% 1.6% 1.9% Endocrine 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% Mental Health/Substance Abuse 1.3% 1.0% 1.5% Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% Other Factors 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% All covariances: 37.1% 37.9% 36.4% Open in a separate window Source: Authors' analysis of Truven MarketScan data, 2013 Decomposition of Variance reduction by Spending Type and Category

Techniques: Virus